Asbury Park City Council Meetings Tonight

Dear Constituents:

I am writing to inform you that the Asbury Park City Council will be meeting tonight, Wednesday, December 20, 2006. The Executive Session begins at 4pm, however this is not open to the public. The Workshop Session begins at 6pm and the Regular Meeting begins at 7pm, these are both open to the public.

I have included tonight’s meeting agendas below and I encourage you to attend.

I hope this finds you well.

Peace,

James W. Keady, Councilman
City of Asbury Park, NJ

ASBURY PARK CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SESSION MEETING AGENDA
DECEMBER 20, 2006 – 4PM
CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC

I. Contract Negotiations
A. State Parking Deck – Mr. Hastie

B. WRA Subcommittee Report – Mr. Sammet
1. Plan Amendment
2. Dispute Resolution Agreement Update
3. Madison Marquette

C. Odor Control Update

II. Litigation
A. Teicher Update – Mr. Aaron
1. Developer’s Agreement
2. Unpaid Property Taxes

B. Asbury Shores Update – Mr. Northgrave

III. Acquisition
A. 214-216 Fourth Avenue (Sigford Ventures), Block 175, Lot 16 – Mr. Aaron

IV. Personnel
A. Asbury Works (2) Positions

B. Tax Assessor (1) Position


ASBURY PARK CITY COUNCIL
WORKSHOP SESSION MEETING AGENDA
DECEMBER 20, 2006 – 6PM
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

I. Review of Regular Agenda

II. Mr. Sammet, Redevelopment and Planning Director
A. Request to extend Paramount Homes’ temporary trailers at current location

B. Planning Board’s recommendation for an amendment to the STARS redevelopment plan at 1406-1422 Springwood Avenue

III. Mr. Gilmour, Commerce and Cultural Director and Mr. Grant, City Engineer
A. CBD Streetscape Design

IV. Mr. Kay, Municipal Clerk
A. Set dates for 2007 regularly scheduled Council meetings

V. Ms. Hartman, Tax Assessor
A. 5-Year exemption at 654 Cookman Avenue for Cookman Asbury Associates IV, LLC

VI. Request for use of public right-of-way for Robert Legere Homes-Design Center

VII. Matters to be introduced by City Council

VIII. Matters to be introduced by City Attorney

IX. Matters to be introduced by City Manager

X. Matters to be introduced by Assistant City Manager


ASBURY PARK CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
NOVEMBER 13, 2006 – 7PM
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

I. Public Participation

II. Approval of Minutes

III. Payroll Resolution

IV. Bill Resolution and Inservco

V. Applications and Liquor Licenses
A. Bingo Licenses for 2007

VI. Resolutions
A. Appointments/Re-Appointments
B. Appoint Registrar, Deputy and Alternate
C. Annual Notice
D. Item from Tax Collector
E. Petty Cash Fund
F. State Purchase – Police: Guns and Vests
G. Budget Transfers
H. Amend 2006 Budget

VII. Ordinances
A. Introduction
1. 214-216 Fourth Avenue

VII. Decision on Bids
A. Jet Vac Truck, Street Sweeper, Sewer Camera,

B. RCA Project – 1106 Monroe Avenue

Asbury Park City Council Meetings Tonight

Dear Constituents:

I am writing to inform you that the Asbury Park City Council will be meeting tonight, Wednesday, December 6, 2006. The Executive Session begins at 5pm, however this is not open to the public. The Workshop Session begins at 6pm and the Regular Meeting begins at 7pm, these are both open to the public.

I have included tonight’s meeting agendas below and I encourage you to attend. I heard this morning from the City Manager that an item will be added to the Executive Committee Agenda posted below. The City Council will be receiving a briefing by Deputy Chief Kinmon about the murder that occurred in Asbury Park last night. Following this briefing I am sure that the governing body will make a collective public statement at the Workshop Session about this unfortunate situation. In any event, I ask that you keep the family of the victim in your prayers as you continue with your day.

I hope this finds you well.

Peace,

James W. Keady, Councilman
City of Asbury Park, NJ

ASBURY PARK CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SESSION MEETING AGENDA
DECEMBER 6, 2006 – 5PM
CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC

I. Contract Negotiations
A. State Parking Deck – Mr. Hastie
B. WRA Subcommittee Report – Mr. Sammet
C. WRA Unpaid Legal Fees/Dispute Resolution Agreement – Mr. Aaron

II. Litigation
A. Teicher Update – Mr. Aaron
B. Market Street Mission – Mr. Raffetto

III. Acquisition
A. 214-216 Fourth Avenue (Sigford Ventures), Block 175, Lot 16 – Mr. Aaron
B. 200 First Avenue, Flamingo Hotel, Block 146, Lot 5 – Mr. Aaron

IV. Personnel
A. Construction Office – Mr. Raffetto
B. Other Matters


ASBURY PARK CITY COUNCIL
WORKSHOP SESSION MEETING AGENDA
DECEMBER 6, 2006 – 6PM
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

I. Review of Regular Agenda

II. Presentation of the Springwood Avenue DRAFT Redevelopment Plan - Mr. Sammet, Redevelopment and Planning Director

III. AP-UEZ Marketing Contracts - Mr. Gilmour, Commerce and Cultural Director

IV. Alternate Street Parking in CBD Area for Clean Streets

V. Conditions Placed on Mercantile License – Mr. Raffetto, City Attorney

VI. Request from Monmouth County Cotillion Committee to utilize one “city date” in Convention Hall

VII. 5-Year Tax Exemption at 654 Cookman Avenue for Cookman Asbury Associates – Mrs. Hartman, Tax Assessor

VIII. Recreation Department’s Hairbraiding First Class Ceremony Presentation – Mr. Famularo, Assistant City Manager

IX. Matters to be Introduced by City Council

X. Matters to be introduced by City Attorney

XI. Matters to be introduced by City Manager

XII. Matters to be introduced by Assistant City Manager


ASBURY PARK CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
DECEMBER 6, 2006 – 7PM
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

I. Public Participation

II. Approval of Minutes

III. Payroll Resolution

IV. Bill Resolution and Inservco

V. Applications and Liquor Licenses
A. Hearing – Cameo Bar

VI. Resolutions
A. Appointments/Re-Appointments
B. Discharge of Mortgage – 1304 Third Avenue
C. Advertise for Various Bids
D. Items from Tax Collector
E. Budget Transfers

VII. Ordinances
A. Introduction – NONE
B. Decision – Carried from 10-4-06 - Eminent Domain: Baronet and Fastlane
C. Public Hearing – Advertised 11-16-06 in the Coaster
1. Amend Animal Control to license cats
2. Sleeping in Public Prohibited

VII. Decision on Bids
1. Jet Vac Truck, Street Sweeper, Sewer Camera, Chlorine and Sludge Transport
2. RCA Project – 154 Ridge Avenue

A Response to "Idealist Becomes the Demagogue"

Dear Constituents,

Below is an Op/Ed of mine that was published on Thursday in the TriCity News. It is a response to Mr. Jacobsen’s recent piece about me titled, “Idealist Becomes the Demagogue.”

Peace,

James W. Keady
Councilman, City of Asbury Park, NJ

GET THE FACTS BEFORE YOU WRITE
By Councilman James W. Keady

In the November 16th issue of the TriCity News, TCN Publisher, Dan Jacobson authored a story titled, “Idealist Becomes the Demagogue,” commenting on an event that took place at the November 13th Asbury Park City Council Meeting. He called me a slew of nasty names and leveled some serious charges against me. What he failed to tell his readers is that he was not in attendance at the Council meeting in question.

In fact, all of Mr. Jacobson’s information from that evening came from secondhand sources. Unfortunately, I am not surprised by this because Mr. Jacobson rarely attends City Council meetings and he usually reports the majority of his “news” from secondhand sources.

Ok, so Dan could not make it to the meeting. He heard about what happened and thought it worthy to write about. Given this, did he do what any fair-minded journalist would do and reach out to me to confirm his “facts” or to seek comment or clarification from me on what he was “reporting”?

No.

What Mr. Jacobson did was print false information and extrapolate his lengthy opinion from it, misinforming and misleading his readership in the process.

When I read the article, I called Dan and asked him why he did not reach out to me to confirm that he had the facts correct given that he was not at the meeting. And he said:

“My deadline was too tight for me to call you.”

His deadline was too tight for him to call me.

Let me give TCN readers a little background here. Dan Jacobson and I have a fairly good rapport with each other and we have an ongoing dialogue on a range of local and national political issues. He has my home phone number, my cell phone number, and my work phone number, all of which he has used in the past to call me about stories he is working on. Dan’s office is about 50 feet from mine – same building, same floor - and he stops by our office regularly. And if I do not see Dan in the office, one of his favorite hang out spots is directly across the street from my home.

Despite all this access and the fact that Dan was writing a story that was focused on me and my statements at a City Council meeting, he never said a word to me.

Now, do I expect Dan Jacobson or anyone for that matter to agree with everything I say or do in my role as a Councilman in Asbury Park? Certainly not, but what I do hope for is simple fairness and accuracy in reporting.

What would have been fair in this situation would have been for Dan to call me and ask me direct questions about what transpired at the November 13, 2006 City Council meeting.

Here are my thoughts on how such a phone call might have gone.

BEGIN INTERVIEW

DJ: JIM, WHAT EXACTLY DID YOU PROPOSE AT THE COUNCIL MEETING REGARDING THE WEST SIDE COMMUNITY CENTER?

During the public portion of the meeting, a significant number of residents and community leaders shared their frustrations about the violence in our streets and its impact on our young people. To combat this problem, they asked for the City Council to offer greater support to the West Side Community Center.

In light of the issues they raised, I put a motion on the floor requesting that the governing body earmark $100,000 in funding from our Community Development and Affordable Housing Fund that could be made available for infrastructure upgrades and programming at the West Side Community Center. I also stated that in order for this money to be released, the West Side Community Center would submit proposals to the City Council on how the money would be used. The governing body would subsequently vote on which proposals they would like to support.

Again, to be clear, I was not saying the money should go to the West Side Community Center that night. I requested a firm and measurable commitment of resources on the part of the City and a process by which those resources could be allocated.

I was unable to garner a second for this motion.

DJ: DID YOU TALK ABOUT THIS ISSUE WITH ANY OF YOUR FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBERS PRIOR TO THE MEETING?

There has been the charge that I “blindsided” my colleagues with my request, that I had never discussed this issue before. On October 18, 2006, the day that Tylik Pugh was shot, I discussed earmarking $250,000 in funds from the Community Development and Affordable Housing Fund for community programs with both the City Manager and the Mayor. My proposal was similar to the one I made on Monday night, that the funds would be set aside and that community organizations like the West Side Community Center, the Boys and Girls Club, the Salvation Army, etc. could apply for money for programs specifically focused on getting our young people off the streets and involved in positive activities. At the request of the Mayor, I did not put forth this proposal publicly that night and I deferred to his desire to have some time to speak with the folks at the West Side Community Center.

DJ: SOME PEOPLE HAVE SAID THAT YOU “SET THIS WHOLE THING UP” AND ORCHESTRATED HAVING THESE PEOPLE COME TO THE COUNCIL MEETING.

There have been some detractors of mine that have suggested that I met with these citizens at a Sunday night meeting prior to the Council meeting and “set the whole thing up.” Not only does such a charge show complete disrespect for the initiative of these West Side residents, it also is false. On Sunday evening, when the community members were holding their meeting, I was at home with my wife, Leslie.

There are others who say that I set this up on Saturday afternoon because my wife and I participated in a “Stop the Violence” vigil and march organized by Mrs. Laura Henry, a Bangs Avenue Resident. This is false as well. To say that I orchestrated what these people said at the meeting is to disregard them as living, breathing, thinking human beings with their own minds. Clearly, those who want to redirect the focus back to me are missing the content of these residents’ statements – which was exactly their point – they feel that no one seems to be listening to their needs.

DJ: SOME PEOPLE IN ASBURY PARK HAVE ACCUSED YOU OF GRANDSTANDING LATELY, HOW WOULD YOU RESPOND TO THIS CHARGE?

My actions have not changed. What has changed is the reaction from certain Asbury Park citizens. I stand up for what I believe is right. I stood up for protecting the Baronet from the specter of eminent domain. I stood up and demanded a greater level of performance by Asbury Partners on our Waterfront. I stood up for more attention and resources to be focused on the Downtown. I stood up to appropriate funds for a summer youth jobs program. I stood up for the gay community when they were unjustly attacked by the Concerned Christian Coalition.

At the November 13th meeting, I stood up and requested that we take official action to earmark resources for the needs of the West Side Community Center and all of a sudden, I’m demonized. I wonder why it is that when I stand up for private property owners or for historical preservation, I am appreciated, but when I stand up for residents on the West Side who deal with violence day in and day out, I’m grandstanding, I’m a demagogue, and I’m “playing the race card”.

DJ: IF YOU ARE REALLY SERIOUS ABOUT HELPING THE WEST SIDE RESIDENTS, WHY DON’T YOU ADVOCATE FOR THINGS LIKE RENT CONTROL?

I have. I wrote back in May of 2006 about my actions on this issue. The complete blog entry can be found at www.keadyreport.blogspot.com. Click on May 2006 under “Archives”.

DJ: FROM WHAT I HAVE HEARD, THE MEMBERS OF THE BLACK COMMUNITY THAT SPOKE AT THE COUNCIL MEETING WERE VERY SUPPORTIVE OF YOU AND VERY CRITICAL OF YOUR FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBERS, WHY DO YOU THINK THAT WAS THE CASE?

Since my election to office, I have made the West Side a priority in my life. I spend time every week walking through the neighborhood listening to concerns of West Side residents and business owners. I also attend a lot of events on the West Side, from community vigils to football games to social events. I have tried, by my actions, to let the people on the West Side know that I am as concerned about their lives and future as I am about folks on the East Side. As for the attitude of those who spoke at the Council meeting towards my colleagues, I would encourage you to do what you did not do in your November 17th issue - get your own first-hand information.

DJ: SOME PEOPLE OUT THERE ARE SAYING THAT YOU ARE TOO FOCUSED ON THE WEST SIDE, TO THE DETRIMENT OF OTHERS IN YOUR CONSTITUENCY. BASICALLY, THERE ARE PEOPLE THAT SUPPORTED YOU WHEN YOU RAN, BUT NOW THEY ARE UNSURE IF YOU STILL SUPPORT THEM AND THEIR CONCERNS. HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO THIS?

I think at the moment, my supporters among the homeowners and business owners are generally frustrated about the pace of redevelopment in Asbury Park. This frustration has been bubbling below the surface for some time now.

Here is a short list of what I believe are the root causes of their frustrations.

1. Despite all the hype about the redevelopment of Asbury Park’s waterfront, Asbury Partners has not created one new residential ratable in four years. This lack of progress occurred despite the fact that we just experienced one of the largest real estate booms in American history. The lack of new ratables means two things - no new customers for business owners and no new tax revenue to lighten the burden on homeowners.

2. Despite all the hype about the redevelopment of Asbury Park’s waterfront, Asbury Partners has not rehabilitated one pavilion, nor have they rehabilitated Convention Hall or the Casino. Because of the way the redevelopment deal was written, there are almost no penalties against Asbury Partners for their slow movement on the waterfront and no “carrot” that the Council majority has agreed on to make the process move faster. Further, the Council has not been public enough about its disapproval of Asbury Partners’ lack of progress.

3. We have had multiple murders in Asbury Park this past year; 102 reported shootings; 50 guns taken off the streets by our Police Department; thousands of arrests; and a growing gang problem in our city.

4. The downtown streetscape has not even started. The rehabilitation of the Steinbach’s building, while underway, has dragged on for years.

5. It does not seem that we have a clear plan for marketing our most tangible assets – Asbury Park as a brand name, Asbury Park’s music and cultural history, and Asbury Park as a summer (and beyond) tourist destination.

6. A concentration of poverty and unstable family situations that lead to crime and a drug trade continue to undermine any efforts made by our school system, our Police Department and our City Government to create a safe and secure city.

DJ: YOU ARE ONLY ONE PERSON ON THE COUNCIL AND YOU ARE IN THE MINORITY. SO WHY ARE PEOPLE SO UPSET WITH YOU?

With people generally frustrated about the progress of redevelopment, you have both new business owners and new homeowners questioning whether or not Asbury Park was a good investment. People are not seeing the progress that they were promised by the re-elected majority of Mayor Sanders, Deputy Mayor Bruno and Councilman Loffredo. Some people are starting to panic that their investment is going to tank and that they are going to lose everything they have risked. This is a tangible fear for people and something the Council needs to take very seriously.

Having said this, I do think there are two issues that people are concerned about specific to me and that may have offered them a channel for their greater frustrations.

First was my nuanced position on the Market Street Mission. A lot of homeowners are upset about this organization setting up shop in Asbury Park and I have heard people placing the blame on me that they have come to our city.

I have been very clear about the facts and my position on this. I did not seek out the Market Street Mission or vote to have them come to Asbury Park. But given the fact that they bought the building and received the appropriate permits to come, I am not going to bury my head in the sand. I am going to engage them and the County on both the Market Street Mission’s policies and the County’s greater responsibility to dealing with problems of homelessness.

I strongly agree that Asbury Park should not be the only town to provide social services for Monmouth County’s homeless. And so I am in the process of engaging the County and State Offices of Human Services and Social Services to designate a clear plan of regionalizing the responsibility for homeless people. If you would like more information on my position, please visit www.keadyreport.blogspot.com. Click on July 2006 under “Archives.” This work is currently underway via the newly created City Subcommittee on Homelessness, which I co-Chair with Councilman Loffredo.

Second, after two non-fatal shootings on the West Side, I truthfully answered questions from a reporter from ABC News about the gang presence in Asbury Park.

The statement I made was on October 17th, the day before Tylik Pugh was fatally shot at 11:30am in broad daylight within 100 yards of our middle school. This was the day before our school board made the decision to close our schools for two days. This was a day before the media descended en masse to cover these events. You had four days worth of regional and national negative media coverage that ensued and I think it just pushed people over the edge.

Some people felt that I could have “spun” or “massaged” my comments to not make the City look bad. My response is that I was elected to proactively attempt to find solutions to the problems our city is facing. We can only solve our problems by facing them honestly.

DJ: OK. SO NOW WHAT?

I believe that a number of things must be done to keep Asbury Park moving forward in a positive direction. I have outlined above a short list of issues that the homeowners and business owners are concerned about. We must couple these with the top three issues from folks on the West Side – job creation, affordable housing and increased recreation opportunities – and get to work solving problems. I have done the analysis and have a number of changes I would like to see made, but I need three votes in order to get anything done. It has been difficult for me to get the support of two other votes since I have been on the Council, and a number of initiatives that I have put forth have not made it because of this.

What we need most is for more Asbury Park residents to get involved by coming to City Council meetings and by joining Boards and Commissions to do the work which needs to be done. The TriCity News could help us in moving the city along by doing real reporting on these issues so that citizens are fully aware, rather than subjective, fact-less rants.

Here are a few questions you could start digging into, to create the dialogue necessary for forward movement:

1. How do we attract light manufacturing into the Memorial Drive corridor to create good paying entry-level manufacturing jobs for West Side residents?

2. Given that Asbury Partners has not delivered any new ratables on the Waterfront and as such, we have a short-term budget gap and a mid-term financial planning problem, how can we fund the programs we need to deal with the roots of crime and gangs in our city with a goal of preventing further violence?

3. How hard of a line should we draw with Asbury Partners at this point in the process? Given their lack of performance on delivering promises made to the community, should we consider more drastic actions for the long-term good of the city?

4. How is the lack of new residents on the waterfront affecting downtown business and overall investment?

5. What is the best way of marketing Asbury Park in a way that maximizes our key historical, musical, cultural and tourist assets?

6. How much affordable housing do we need and what exactly does “affordable” mean in Asbury Park?

7. What vision for Asbury Park will best serve the economic and social needs of its current residents?

Now Dan, I do not want you to tell me what you usually do - “people don’t want to read about all that stuff – it’s too boring for them. They don’t care.” People do want to read about this, they do care, and you need to report on it. Even those people in the suburbs that you consistently harp on know that finding answers to questions like these is critical if Asbury Park is going to redevelop in a way that is sustainable both economically and socially. I am doing my part by trying to find policy answers to these questions. It is where my energy has been and will continue to be focused during my term in office.

We know that you want Asbury Park to be just like Berkeley, Madison or Asheville. Something that those towns have is an independent, alternative newspaper that reports in detail on the issues that the mainstream news agencies miss. We need you to do your part – research issues first-hand and report.

Why? Because you are the TriCity News and you’re here to help.

END INTERVIEW

Important Workshop for AP Parents this Tuesday Night

Dear Constituents,

I am writing to inform you about an important event taking place tomorrow night.

The Asbury Park School District - District Wide & School Based Parent/Community Liaisons are sponsoring a Title I & No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Training.

EDUCATION AND PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT AND RESPONSIBILITIES

When: November 28, 2006 – 6:00-7:30pm
Where: Bradley Elementary School, 1100 Third Avenue, Asbury Park

Refreshments will be served.

Speakers include:

Mr. Dale Caldwell, President of New Brunswick Board of Education, and the Middlesex Region Educational Services Commission, and is a former deputy commissioner of the State Department of Community Affairs.

Ms. Anna Taliaferro, Parent Resource Center Supervisor, Paterson, NJ, and president of the New Jersey Association of Parent Coordinators, Inc. She has a long history and expertise in advocating for parents locally and nationally.

For more information contact Ms. Jessie M. Ricks at 732.776.2559, Ext. 2562.

I hope you can attend.

Peace, JWK

James W. Keady, Councilman
City of Asbury Park, NJ

Springwood Avenue Redevelopment Plan - Information Session

Dear Constituents,

On behalf of myself, Councilman Johnson and the entire Springwood Avenue Advisory Committee, I would like to invite you to attend an information and discussion session regarding the Amended Springwood Avenue Redevelopment Plan.

This community meeting will take place this Thursday, November 30, 2006 at 6pm at Sisters Academy, which is located on the corner of Springwood and Ridge Avenues, Asbury Park.

At this event we will be offering the community a first look at the draft Amended Springwood Avenue Redevelopment Plan that the committee has generated after more than a year of concerted effort.

Following this information session, we will present the draft plan to the Mayor and Council on December 6, 2006. We also will allow the community a 30-day review period and we will schedule a number of input/feedback sessions with the public throughout January 2007. When these are completed, we will make final recommendations to the Mayor and Council in February 2007.

It is important for you to know that the plan is not in its final form. This is a crucial time for the public to give input and help us to shape the plan so that the community feels 100% comfortable with its contents.

If you have any questions prior to the meeting, feel free to email me at james.keady@cityofasburypark.com or call me at 732-502-5196.

I hope this finds you well and I look forward to seeing you on Thursday.


Peace, JWK


James W. Keady, Councilman
City of Asbury Park, NJ

Happy Thanksgiving!

Dear Constituents,

My wife Leslie and I would like to wish each of you and your families a happy and healthy Thanksgiving. In honor of this wonderful holiday, I would like to share with you a poem by Joanna Fuchs that I particularly enjoy.

Thanksgiving is the appointed time
for focusing on the good in our lives.
In each of our days,
we can find small blessings,
but too often we overlook them,
choosing instead to spend our time
paying attention to problems.
We give our energy
to those who cause us trouble
instead of those who bring peace.
Starting now,
let’s be on the lookout
for the bits of pleasure in each hour,
and appreciate the people who
bring love and light to everyone
who is blessed to know them.
You are one of those people.
On Thanksgiving,
I’m thankful for you.
###

On a related Thanksgiving note, for many of us, Thanksgiving weekend is not complete without a solid dose of football. Given this, I would like to invite you to attend one or all of the following Thanksgiving weekend football games to support our kids in Asbury Park.

Friday 11:00am at Toms River South High School
Asbury Park Junior Midgets vs. Bridgewater-Raritan
Eastern Region Pop Warner Championship
If they win they will go to the National Championship in Orlando, Florida

Saturday at 4:30pm at Toms River South
Asbury Park Pee-Wees vs. White Oak, MD
Eastern Region Pop Warner Championship
If they win they will go to the National Championship in Orlando, Florida

Saturday at 10:30am at Neptune High School
Asbury Park HS Blue Bishops play the Neptune HS Scarlet Fliers
Regular Season Game

I hope this finds you well and again, HAPPY THANKSGIVING!

Peace, JWK

Request for Funding for the West Side Community Center

Dear Constituents,

I am writing to share information with you about the discussion that occurred at last Monday’s City Council Meeting regarding earmarking funds for potential use by the West Side Community Center.

During the public portion of the meeting, a significant number of residents and community leaders shared their frustrations about the violence in our streets and its impact on our young people. To combat this problem, they asked for the City Council to offer greater support to the West Side Community Center.

In light of the issues they raised, I put a motion on the floor requesting that the governing body earmark $100,000 in funding from our Community Development and Affordable Housing Fund that could be made available for infrastructure upgrades and programming at the West Side Community Center. I also stated that in order for this money to be released, the West Side Community Center would submit proposals to the City Council on how the money would be used. The governing body would subsequently vote on which proposals they would like to support.

I was unable to garner a second for this motion.

There have been some detractors of mine that have suggested that I met with these citizens on Sunday night prior to the meeting and “set the whole thing up.” Not only does such a charge show complete disrespect for the initiative of these West Side residents, it also is patently false. On Sunday evening, when the community members were holding their meeting, I was at home with my wife, Leslie.

There has also been the charge that I “blindsided” my colleagues with my request, that I had never discussed this issue before. On October 18, 2006, the day that Tylik Pugh was shot, I discussed earmarking $250,000 in funds from the Community Development and Affordable Housing Fund for community programs with both the City Manager and the Mayor. My proposal was similar to the one I made on Monday night, that the funds would be set aside and that community organizations like the West Side Community Center, the Boys and Girls Club, the Salvation Army, etc. could apply for money for programs specifically focused on getting our young people off the streets and involved in positive activities. At the request of the Mayor, I did not put forth this proposal publicly that night and I deferred to his desire to have some time to speak with the folks at the West Side Community Center.

It has also been said that there was no basis for the $100,000 amount that I requested be earmarked on Monday night. In my numerous conversations with staff, the former Executive Director, their consultant, and board members at the West Side Community Center, I learned quite a bit about their needs, financial and otherwise. In addition, 8 months ago, in March 2006, the West Side Community Center gave a proposal to the City requesting approximately $90,000 in funding for infrastructure upgrades to the facility. This proposal has not been moved forward to date.

Regarding the infrastructure needs to the West Side Community Center: they are deeply in need of having the bathrooms in the gym completely rehabilitated; the electrical wiring in the main building completely redone; a general facelift for both the exteriors and the interiors of the gym and the main building; and help in creating renewable revenue streams to maintain appropriate staffing levels and programming for our kids. I strongly believe that making an investment into the West Side Community Center has the potential to reap benefits for the city now and in years to come.

If you have an idea on how we can best approach the items listed above or perhaps you would like to donate your time or financial resources, please let me know.

While much attention has been focused on my approach to these issues of late, the realities still remain. I am hopeful that the entire community will work together collaboratively to address these challenges, and I firmly believe that we have it within us to accomplish the task.

I hope this finds you well.

Peace, JWK

What Every Tennant Needs to Know

Dear Constituents,

If you or someone you know has ever asked any of the following questions…

My landlord raised my rent $300. Is that legal?
What happens to my “stuff” if I am evicted?
Can I be evicted for not having a lease?
I’ve been waiting 90 days for my security deposit. Is that legal?
They are trying to take my Section 8 away, what can I do?

Then you need to join us at:

“WHAT EVERY TENNANT NEEDS TO KNOW”

Saturday, November 18, 2006

10:00AM – 2:00PM

At The Salvation Army, 605 Asbury Avenue, Asbury Park, New Jersey

Free Recordkeeping Kits & Cameras for the First Fifty (50) Participants

For More Information Contact Ms. Hazel Samuels: (732) 502-4589

Sponsored by the City of Asbury Park’s Affordable Housing Subcommittee and the Asbury Park Office of Housing and Community Development

Peace, JWK

Keady Supported by AP Press Editorial Board

Asbury Park's Lightning Rod

Posted by the Asbury Park Press (http://www.app.com/) on 11/12/06

If Asbury Park Councilman James Keady were being graded on his ability to alienate people, he'd be doing "A" work this marking period.

First, he irritated fellow council members by joining union workers protesting the use of nonunion workers in some of the beachfront redevelopment projects. Two weeks ago, following the fatal shooting of 18-year-old Tylik Pugh, he told a New York City television station that Asbury Park was home to 200 members of the Bloods gang — a comment that prompted the city's Urban Enterprise Zone board of directors to ask him to resign his council seat and, for good measure, to leave town.

Now, he has incurred the wrath of the city school board for touring Asbury Park High and meeting with students there without getting permission from the acting superintendent. Keady says his visit was blessed by the building principal.

The issue here shouldn't be Keady, but trying to solve the problems Keady has demonstrated he is concerned enough about to reach out directly to the kids in the community. He should be applauded for taking the initiative to try to better understand the city's youth and the dynamics of youth violence. Instead of sending out letters criticizing him, the school board should be encouraging every other council member and community leader to follow his lead.

Keady says he obtained valuable information from the students. "I thought, and still do think, that the solutions lie with them," he said. So do we. Community leaders need to engage those students, as well as their parents and guardians, in an ongoing conversation. That will be much easier to do if the council and school board can do a better job of conversing amongst themselves.

City Council Meetings Tonight

Dear Constituents:

I am writing to inform you that the Asbury Park City Council will be meeting tonight, Monday, November 13, 2006. The Executive Session begins at 5pm, however this is not open to the public. The Workshop Session begins at 6pm and the Regular Meeting begins at 7pm, these are both open to the public.

These meetings are being held today, instead of our usual meeting date on the third Wednesday of the month, because the City Council will be attending the NJ League of Municipalities Convention in Atlantic City later in the week.

I have included tonight’s meeting agendas below and I encourage you to attend.

I hope this finds you well.

Peace,

James W. Keady, Councilman
City of Asbury Park, NJ

ASBURY PARK CITY COUNCIL
EXECUTIVE SESSION MEETING AGENDA
NOVEMBER 13, 2006 – 5PM
CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC

I. Contract Negotiations
A. November 9th Waterfront Redevelopment Area Subcommittee Meeting with Asbury Partners – Mr. Donald Sammet, Redevelopment and Planning Director

II. Litigation
A. Preliminary Investigation Report for Springwood Avenue Redevelopment Plan – Mr. Sammet, Redevelopment and Planning Director

B. Market Street Mission – Mr. Fred Raffetto, City Attorney


ASBURY PARK CITY COUNCIL
WORKSHOP SESSION MEETING AGENDA
NOVEMBER 13, 2006 – 6PM
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

I. Review of Regular Agenda

II. Mr. Donald Sammet, Redevelopment and Planning Director
A. Schedule of Events for Springwood Avenue Redevelopment Plan

III. Thomas Gilmour, Commerce and Cultural Director
A. Trash Containers for Central Business District Streetscape
B. Marketing Firm Selection
C. Garden State Film Festival Nomination

IV. Kevin Keddy, Fire Chief
A. Fair Exchange of Equipment with the Kearny (NJ) Fire Department

V. Tom Hastie, McManimon and Scotland
A. Request by the Cameo Bar to Modify Conditions on Alcohol License

VI. Mark Kinmon, Deputy Police Chief
A. Request from Wali Mohammed, Jr. to have grass area be cemented for smooth transition from van to sidewalk.

VII. Special Event Applications
A. Check Mate Annual Candlelight Walk 803 3rd to Trinity Church 12/1

VIII. Tony Nuccio, Social Services Director
A. Sleeping in Public Ordinance

IX. Mr. Fred Raffetto, City Attorney
A. Animal Control Fees Ordinance (Discussion)

X. Mr. Paul Torman, Merchants’ Guild
A. Central Business District Issues as Requested by Councilman Keady

XI. Matters to be Introduced by City Council

XI. Matters to be introduced by City Attorney

XII. Matters to be introduced by City Manager

XIII. Matters to be introduced by Assistant City Manager


ASBURY PARK CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
NOVEMBER 13, 2006 – 7PM
OPEN TO THE PUBLIC

I. Public Participation

II. Approval of Minutes

III. Payroll Resolution

IV. Bill Resolution and Inservco

V. Applications and Liquor Licenses

VI. Resolutions
A. Appointments/Re-Appointments
B. Contract with Visiting Nurse Association of Central NJ
C. Insurance Settlements
D. $600.00 for Recreation – Music Camp
D. Discharge of Mortgage – 201 Borden Avenue
E. Amend Budget (2 items)
F. Items from the Tax Collector (4 items)

VII. Ordinances:
A. Introduction
1. Sleeping in Public Prohibited

B. Public Hearings - Advertised 10/26/06
1. Amend Taxi Ordinance
2. Release Easement at 1406-1422 Springwood Avenue
3. Convey Easement – 407 Grand Avenue and 503 Cookman Avenue

CM Keady's August Newsletter

Dear Constituents,

I am writing to update you on the progress of the various committees on which I serve and on other initiatives I am pursuing on behalf of the citizens of Asbury Park. After posting this to my blog and sending an e-mail alert, I will be taking a much needed break from work to rest and rejuvenate. I will respond to any of your replies or questions when I return to the office on September 5th.

I hope you enjoy the remaining days of summer!

Peace, JWK

SUBCOMMITTEE ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING
At the August 16th City Council meeting, the Council agreed (with the recommendation made by myself and Mayor Sanders on behalf of the Subcommittee on Affordable Housing) to send out a “Request for Proposals” for Area 1 of the STARS Redevelopment Plan. Area 1 is made up of the properties bordered by Atkins Avenue, Adams Avenue, Borden Avenue and the Asbury/Neptune City line. The goal for this area is to create 60-100 affordable housing opportunities with a heavy focus on homeownership.

Along with action on Area 1 of STARS, we are also ready to move forward on redevelopment in Area 3 (Ridge Avenue) of the plan as well as on two Bangs Avenue properties. We have a little more legwork to do to get Area 2 (Borden Avenue) of the STARS plan online, but I am confident that this will be addressed in the coming weeks. When completed, these redevelopment areas should create close to 20 affordable housing opportunities with homeownership as the primary goal.

SPRINGWOOD AVENUE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
The excitement and momentum continues to build regarding the redevelopment of Springwood Avenue. On Friday, August 11th, myself, Councilman Johnson, City Staff and members of the Advisory Committee spent the day at the Berkeley Carteret Hotel for a marathon planning session. Throughout the day we covered the following: the vision, goals and objectives for the plan, land use, identifying specific district elements, cataloging existing assets, design guidelines, utilities, green building projects, retail and commercial opportunities, housing, open/public space, education and recreation opportunities, and community resources.

The overriding goal for this session, which we achieved, was to give Don Sammet, our Director of Planning and Redevelopment, the information he will need to write the redevelopment plan for the Springwood Avenue corridor. Our hope is to have this plan ready for public review, comment and revisions in early Fall.

SUBCOMMITTEE ON HOMELESSNESS
At the August 16th City Council meeting, the Council agreed with the recommendation made by myself and Mayor Sanders to establish a Subcommittee on Homelessness. The committee will be chaired by myself and Councilman Loffredo and will consist of representatives from our Social Services Department, Monmouth County Social Services, NJ Department of Supportive Housing, local service providers, and city residents.

My vision for this committee is to create and execute a plan of action that will end homelessness in Asbury Park. I believe we can do this by a more efficient delivery of services and by demanding that communities from Brielle to the Atlantic Highlands share in the responsibility for the caretaking and rehabilitation of homeless individuals.

ADVISORY BOARD FOR ASBURY WORKS
Much of the recent energy of the Advisory Board for Asbury Works has been spent on supporting our Summer Youth Jobs Initiative. Our goal for this program was to put 80 city youth to work this summer. To date, we have had approximately 120 youth take part in the program – 120 of Asbury Park’s youth working in summer jobs, earning money, learning important skills, and being productive members of society.


RECREATION INITIATIVES
New Senior Swim Program:
I am happy to announce that via my new role as a Board Member of the Community YMCA, I was able to help create our new Asbury Park Senior Swim Program. Sessions will be held at the Red Bank YMCA from 2-3pm on the first and third Thursdays of each month. There will be lanes for swimming as well as water aerobics with an instructor. I would like to thank Wendy Lukowitz from the Asbury Park Senior Center and Kristen Weber from the Community YMCA for helping to coordinate this program. Seniors can sign up for this FREE program by contacting the Senior Center at 848-992-1334.

Summer Soccer Program:
I would also like to report that the Fourth Annual Asbury Park Summer Soccer Program was a rousing success. This year we had over 75 children and adults participate in the program. I would like to thank my wife, Leslie Kretzu, who co-directed the program with me this year. I would also like to thank Dolan Williams who helped with coaching, as well as TJ’s Pizza and the Shore Wellness Center for their financial support.

Upgrading our Athletic Fields:
In the past few weeks I have been in conversation with our High School Athletic Director about the possibility of upgrading our athletic fields at the High School and the Middle School. My vision is to have each of our fields surfaced with cutting edge “Field Turf” or artificial surface used on many professional, college and high school fields across the country. This vision also includes installing lights at the High School stadium. Such an upgrade, coupled with increased community and police supervision, would do wonders for our City, particularly for our youth. Imagine having three first class athletic fields that were available for year-round programming. (An added bonus with regard to the artificial surface will be that Canadian geese will no longer be able to feed on the grass of the athletic fields and therefore, will not linger about and defecate on the athletic fields, which has been a problem in the past.) To make this vision a reality, we are going to need the cooperation of both the City Council and the Asbury Park School Board. As we move into the Fall, I plan to continue researching and dialoguing on this issue and my hope is that by the winter, we will have a plan in place to execute this vision.

Re-establishing a YMCA Presence in Asbury Park:
This past week I met with a fellow Community YMCA board member about how we can re-establish a presence for the YMCA in Asbury Park. We agreed that the best approach is to start with some programming initiatives. In the coming weeks, we will be meeting with YMCA staff to create a plan of action to bring the following programs to Asbury Park: an After-school Program, a Learning Center Program, an Adult Life-Skills Program, and “Beyond Asbury.” “Beyond Asbury” is an idea that I have been developing for about two years now. My vision is to create a program where we can bring kids from our city to locations and events that they would not normally have access to. The hope is that by exposing them to what is literally “Beyond Asbury” that they will be inspired to greater levels of achievement academically and socially.

WESLEY LAKE COMMISSION
On August 23rd, as a Representative of the Wesley Lake Commission, I attended the Citizen’s for Wesley Lake meeting at Neptune Township Town Hall. It was a very productive work session. By the end of the meeting, five subcommittees were created and tasked with pulling together resources for a plan of action that will be presented jointly to the Asbury Park City Council and the Neptune Township Committee. The subcommittees would focus on: revisiting the existing Wesley Lake Commission enabling ordinance and making suggestions for revisions to the ordinance; possible Commission restructuring; creating a plan for infrastructure restoration; targeting funding sources for project work; immediate clean-up and rehabilitation projects; creating a plan for community education and outreach about Wesley Lake.

I volunteered to serve on the subcommittee focusing on immediate clean-up and rehabilitation projects along with Neptune’s Deputy Mayor, Mike Golub. At the moment, my short list for this work includes clearing out the storm drains of silt on Lake Avenue, upgrading the lighting along the lake and on the footbridges, and re-landscaping the entrances to the bridges. I am sure that once the evaluation is complete this list will have grown significantly.

WATERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT
There are two timely issues regarding the Waterfront Redevelopment Plan that I would like to report on:

Baronet Theater:
At the August 16th City Council meeting there was to have been a vote to condemn the Baronet Theater by eminent domain. During the deliberations on this matter, I asked what I believed were some key questions. I asked the Councilmembers on the Waterfront Redevelopment Subcommittee – CM Johnson and DM Bruno – if Asbury Partners had presented any materials that I was unaware of that detailed their plans for this particular block. They responded that Asbury Partners had not presented any such materials. I also asked, in light of this, why there was the current urgency to condemn these two particular properties. There did not seem to be any clear answer to this question from anyone.

Councilman Johnson and I, as well as many supporters in the pubic, felt that there was no clear reason that we should be condemning the Baronet at this time. Despite that, it seemed that this was the direction that things were going in. Then Councilman John Loffredo read a letter into the record from Larry Fishman of Asbury Partners that detailed Asbury Partners’ commitment to maintaining film programming in Asbury Park at a number of venues. Upon the reading of this letter, I asked Councilman Loffredo if he would support having the commitments that Asbury Partners outlined “memorialized” via contract. He agreed. The vote was then tabled until September 6th and direction was given by the Council for the Waterfront Redevelopment Subcommittee to negotiate this issue with Asbury Partners. Ultimately, will this save the Baronet? I am not sure. However, it now gives the Waterfront Redevelopment Subcommittee some leverage going into a negotiating session. My hope is that they come out with a commitment from Asbury Partners to save the Baronet.

5th Avenue Pavillion:
They say that a picture says a thousand words. Click here to see an artist’s rendering for the rehabilitation of the 5th Avenue Pavilion.

http://thecoaster.net/wordpress/?p=774#more-774

If Asbury Partners delivers on this, it would be the most significant project on the City’s Waterfront in 30 years in my opinion. As I did at the City Council meeting, I will again congratulate them for what appears to be a “home run.” It is now the responsibility of the City Council to hold Asbury Partners to their word and ensure that the project is delivered in a timely fashion.


MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS FOR AUGUST
On August 1st I had a great time reading to the kids at the Westside Community Center’s “Freedom School” program and then attending the Westside’s community event later that evening.

On August 7th I was honored to have witnessed the swearing in of Kevin Keddy, our new Fire Chief, as well as the promotions of a number of our City Firefighters.

On August 11th I enjoyed a wonderful evening at a fundraiser for Asbury’s own Garden State Film Festival.

On August 19th I was honored to co-Chair the “Back to School Block Party” with CM Johnson. For those of you who did not attend, you missed your chance to dunk me in the dunking booth. But don’t worry, the kids more than made up for your absence.

Later that afternoon on August 19th I “went green,” and took in all that the Clearwater Festival had to offer. This is one of my favorite annual events in Asbury Park and I enjoyed every minute - especially reliving some high school memories listening to the Smithereens perform.

On August 22nd, I attended the monthly meeting of the Asbury Park Senior Center. I updated them on the swim program and I discussed the possibility of free matinees for Seniors at the Baronet Theater.

On August 24th, I attended a very exciting meeting for the “Improving the Odds” initiative at the Asbury Park Middle School. This initiative is working to create a plan of action for increasing involvement among students and parents and increasing academic performance at the Middle School.

On August 25th, I started a much needed break from work! As I wrote above, I will be out of the office until September 5th. I hope that anything you might need from me can wait until my return; however, if there is an emergency, please call me at home at 732.988.9985.

Public Forum on Asbury Park Housing Crisis

Constituents,

I received the following from Fr. Bill McLaughlin at Holy Spirit Church and I would encourage you to attend.

Peace, JWK

CRISIS IN HOUSING IN OUR CITY AND COUNTY:

Please participate in a forum to be held at Holy Spirit Church, 705 Second Ave. from 8:00 til 10:00 pm. This forum will be broadcast live on Asbury Radio with Maureen Nevin as host. The issues to be addressed:

1. The cost and availability of housing, especially home ownership, for those who fall under the median income for our area. Many are under the wage guidelines for poverty.

2. The cost and availability of shelter for those who are "de facto" homeless in our city and area. What can be done to help those who wish to help our poorest brothers and sisters?

3. How do we help meet the challenges posed by overcrowding in many parts of the city?

If you can't be here, give a call to the radio for your input.

Fr. Bill McLaughlin, Pastor

Baronet Theater Vote Tonight!

Dear Constituents,

At tonight’s City Council Meeting the governing body will be voting on whether or not to condemn the historic Baronet Theater through the use of eminent domain. Please come out and encourage my fellow City Council members to vote “NO” on this issue.

For your convenience, I have posted the agendas for all of tonight’s meetings below.

Peace,

Councilman James W. Keady


City Council Meeting: Executive Session (Closed to the Public)
Wednesday, August 16, 2006 – 4:00pm

I. Litigation
A. Teicher Update – Mr. Aaron
B. Martone vs. Jordan – Mr. Raffetto
C. Pam LiPira Matter
D. Block 227 Tax Appeal: Dispute Resolution – Mr. Aaron

II. Contract Negotiations
A. Block 222, Lot 1 – Triangle Property – Mr. Aaron
B. Tax Abatement Request/The Center – Mr. Mayers
C. Storage for Tillie – Mr. Sammet
D. Amusement Rides on Boardwalk

III. Easement Request/RDR – Fred Raffetto

IV. Personnel
A. Main Street Redevelopment Committee Appointments – CM Loffredo
B. Municipal Court Review by Judge Lawson
C. City Manager’s Contract


City Council Meeting: Workshop Session (Open to the Public)
Wednesday, August 16, 2006 – 6:00pm

I. Review of Regular Agenda

II. Asbury Partners – 5th Avenue Pavilion

III. Mr. Tony Nuccio – Sleeping in Public Ordinance

IV. Mr. Brian Grant, City Engineer
A. Engineering Services
B. HVAC Update

V. Mr. Tom Gilmour, Director of Commerce/UEZ
A. Funding of Fire Equipment
B. Façade Improvement Program

VI. Affordable Housing Subcommittee - Mayor Sanders and CM Keady
A. Request for RFP Phase I STARS Area

VII. Subcommittee on Homelessness - Mayor Sanders and CM Keady

VIII. Mr. Fred Raffetto, City Attorney
A. Right of Access Agreement, Block 98, Lots 3&4 – Mr. Yi, Springwood Avenue

IX. Special Event Applications
1. Jersey Shore VB VB Tourney Beach 9-9/10-06
2. Asbury Lanes Vintage Car Show Asbury Lanes 8-14/25/26
3. Cathedral Intl. Water Baptism. 4th Ave Beach 8-6-06
4. Greg Rinaldi Truck Show Bradley Park 9-3-06
5. Marie Thompson Barbecue Beach/BPark 9-17-06
6. St. George’s Lunch Bradley Park 9-17-06
7. APMS PTO Health Fair Prospect Avenue 9-19-06
8. Surfrider Fdn. Family Day 8th Ave Beach 8-12-06
9. City of AP Back to School Bangs Avenue 8-19-06
10. Bethel AME Block Party Langford 8-27-06
11. AP Little League Barbecue Sunset Park 8-29-06

X. Matters to introduced by City Council
A. Councilman Johnson
B. Councilman Loffredo
C. Deputy Mayor Bruno
D. Mayor Sanders
E. Councilman Keady
1. Senior Swim Program
2. JUMP Mentoring Program

XI. Matters to be introduced by City Attorney

XII. Matters to be introduced by City Manager

XIII. Matters to be introduced by Assistant City Manager

City Council Meeting: Regular Meeting (Open to the Public)
Wednesday, August 16, 2006 – 7:00pm

I. Public Participation

II. Approval of Minutes

III. Payroll Resolution

IV. Bill Resolution and Inservco

V. Applications and Liquor Licenses
A. Bingo License – Synagogue of Elberon BL: 6-2006
B. Renewal – Liquor Licenses – Special Rulings:
1. J&M Real Estate (pocket license)
2. DB Ventures – 206-208 Main Street (inactive)
3. Sixth Gear – 649 Mattison Avenue (inactive)
4. Asbury Fun – 207 Fourth Avenue (inactive)

VI. Resolutions
A. Appointments/re-appointments
B. City Clerk to publish 2005 Audit Summary
C. Multi-Purpose Sr. Center grants 2007-2009
D. Return overpayment of taxes – 407 Lake Avenue
E. Discharge of Mortgage – 831 Central Avenue
F. Discharge of Mortgage – 517 Munroe Avenue
G. Subordination of Mortgage – 1319 Summerfield Avenue
H. Items from the Tax Collector (2)
I. Accept 1968 Fire Truck from Ocean Township
J. Group Affidavit – 2005 Audit
K. Recreation - $2,500 Grant to Westside Community Center
L. Adoption of 2006 Budget (If approved by DCA)

VII. Ordinances – Introduction (None)

IX. Ordinances – Public Hearing – Advertised 7-13-06/7-27-06 Coaster
A. Bond- 2006 Road Program $450K
B. Bond – Sewer Repair $260K
C. Penalties for Curfew Violation
D. Eminent Domain: 205-207 Fourth Avenue

VIII. Decision on RCA Project Bids
A. 1209 Summerfield Avenue
B. 1114 Jeffrey Street
C. 1517 Bangs Avenue
D. 1505 Sewall Avenue

IX. Verizon Cable Application Hearing

Statement on the Baronet Theater

In recent weeks, there has been much discussion in the community about Saving the Baronet Theater from being condemned by eminent domain.

The current owner of the Baronet Theater, as almost all of you know, is Mr. Pat Fasano. In the 2004 Municipal Election, Mr. Fasano contributed $583 in support of my candidacy. In light of this, when the ordinance to take the Baronet by eminent domain was introduced at the July 6th City Council meeting, I recused myself from voting on the issue.

Tonight there will be a public hearing and most likely a vote on whether or not the City Council will take the Baronet from Mr. Fasano by eminent domain.

After careful consideration and conversations with our legal counsel, two additional attorneys, and a broad cross section of my constituents, I have made the decision that I will NOT be recusing myself from discussion and the potential vote on this matter at tonight’s City Council meeting.

I have made my positions on eminent domain and the preservation of our historical assets crystal clear both before and after the election. I am quite comfortable and confident that the modest contribution made by Mr. Fasano to my campaign will in no way cloud my judgment, influence my decision or compromise my ethics on this matter. Moreover, neither I, nor any members of my immediate family or any business organizations in which I have an interest have a direct or indirect financial or personal involvement that might reasonably be expected to impair my objectivity or independence of judgment. Regardless of who owned the Baronet Theater, I would vote in the same way.

Having said this, why do I feel we should SAVE THE BARONET?

First, it is a historical asset with a rich architectural and programmatic history. Second, the current owners have made the necessary renovations and are now ready to open the venue thus creating another destination location for people to visit in Asbury Park. Third, they plan to show movies on Friday through Sunday for $2 per ticket. Given the economic demographics in our city, this will make a night at the movies affordable for our working families. Fourth, they are willing to allow various community groups use the facility for programming. Finally, I have not seen, nor heard of any concrete plans that Asbury Partners has for this particular block and therefore I do not feel that there is any pressing need for this property to be taken at this time.

Peace, JWK

Statement on the Market Street Mission

In recent weeks, there has been much discussion in the community about the Market Street Mission coming to Asbury Park. There are also seems to be misconceptions about my position on this issue.

History of the issue

Some time ago, Market Street Mission, d/b/a Jersey Shore Rescue Mission ("the applicant") made application to the City to conduct an operation involving multiple uses at the property located at 701 Memorial Drive within the City. The Zoning Board considered this matter at 6 public hearings, held between April of 2005 and November of 2005. These hearings were all publicly noticed, and various members of the public participated at each meeting. On November 29, 2005, the Zoning Board voted to deny the application. This denial was memorialized by a resolution that was adopted on Jan. 10, 2006. Following the Zoning Board's denial, the applicant filed a lawsuit known as an "Action in Lieu of Prerogative Writs" in Superior Court, Law Division, in Freehold. This is the typical way to challenge any action taken by a governmental entity.

On February 28, 2006, the Court ruled that the Zoning Board's denial of the application was "arbitrary, capricious and unreasonable," and not supported by the record before the Board. The Court found that the Zoning Board had failed to address the application properly under the "inherently beneficial use" standard prescribed under the law, which is applicable in land use matters when dealing with applications for hospitals and similar uses that are deemed to be inherently beneficial to the public good.

Ultimately, the Court entered an Order reversing the Board's denial, and sent the matter back to the Zoning Board for further review utilizing the correct "inherently beneficial use" standard. The Zoning Board was ordered to re-evaluate the matter within 30 days of the Court's decision (or within 30 days of February 28, 2006).

Following the Court's action, the Zoning Board scheduled an additional public hearing, held on March 14, 2006, to re-consider the application in light of the Court's findings. That hearing took place as scheduled, and was publicly noticed. On that date, the Board re-considered the application under the "inherently beneficial use" standard, as required by the Court's ruling, and voted that evening to reverse its prior decision, and to grant all variances and other approvals requested. This decision was memorialized by Resolution dated March 28, 2006.

In response to the action taken by the Zoning Board, a citizen’s group, “Stand Up for Asbury,” has filed a lawsuit in an attempt to prevent the Market Street Mission from coming to Asbury Park and they have publicly requested that the governing body join this lawsuit.

Amicus Brief

At tonight’s City Council meeting, the governing body most likely will be voting on a resolution to file an amicus (friend of the court) brief in support of the lawsuit that has been filed by members of “Stand Up for Asbury.” I will be voting NO on this resolution, and I’d like to tell you why. But first, I’d like to clear up some misinformation.

In their literature, the group “Stand Up For Asbury” wrongly states that, “There are 7 other shelters in Asbury Park that have overnight sleeping quarters for the homeless.” And the Coaster printed that information in their July 13th edition without any fact-checking, I later learned. There are not 7 shelters in Asbury Park. There are currently NO shelters in Asbury Park that offer overnight sleeping quarters for the homeless. There are seven agencies that offer services for the homeless and transitional residential housing for specific populations (abused women, HIV/AIDS, etc.) but there is no agency currently operating in Asbury Park that would meet the loosest definition of a homeless shelter.

There are three main reasons why I will vote NO on the resolution to file an amicus brief.

First, I believe that filing this amicus brief is a waste of taxpayer money. I believe it is a waste of money because I am fairly confident that the lawsuit will not be successful and that my colleagues may be pursuing this action for purely political reasons.

I believe the amicus brief is a waste of taxpayer money because our lawyers will have to take the time to research the issue, draft the amicus brief and file it on our behalf – all to the tune of $110 per hour over roughly 30-40 hours.

Second, I will be voting NO on this resolution tonight because, as a member of the Affordable Housing Subcommittee, I know that we do indeed have a homeless problem in Asbury Park which exists right now and needs to be addressed. That said, I also agree that there are serious concerns with certain Market Street Mission policies and with bringing in more people to Asbury Park who are not current or former residents that will need social services. I did not seek out the Market Street Mission or vote to have them come to Asbury Park, but I will engage them on the issues of concern that I share with many of you.

I will engage the Market Street Mission regarding their troubling policies on background checks, their exclusion of gay clients and their plans for clients during the day and when clients are discharged from the Mission. I had hoped to have done this prior to tonight’s vote, but the Management of the Mission has been advised not to meet with any members of the governing body or engage in any discussion whatsoever until the litigation is resolved. In light of this, I have already begun to seek information from other sources. To gain a better understanding of how good of a “neighbor” the Market Street Mission has been in its hometown of Morristown, I have reached out to the Mayor of Morristown, the Chief of Police of Morristown, and the Director of Human Services. To date, I am still waiting to hear from the Mayor, but from those whom I have spoken with, I have not received any information that the Market Street Mission’s operation in Morristown has been significantly problematic.

I will also engage the County and State Offices of Human Services and Social Services and request a clear plan of action that regionalizes the responsibility for helping the homeless. The first phase of this engagement would be to get us the resources we need to adequately service the needs in our community. The second phase would be to create a countywide and/or statewide plan to share the responsibilities, financial and otherwise, to end homelessness in NJ. In my research, I have found a plan that was put forth by the New Jersey State Policy Academy Team to do just this. Their “Preliminary Action Plan to End Homelessness in New Jersey” can be found at:

http://www.hrsa.gov/homeless/state_pages/pa4/ap/nj_ap.htm

Just today I had a conversation with Deborah De Santis, the Director of the Corporation for Supportive Housing and one of the co-chairs of the Policy Academy Team that authored the plan. The discussion was very enlightening and I will be meeting with her and the members of the CEAS Committee (Comprehensive Emergency Assistance System) this coming week to begin to address homeless issues specific to Asbury Park.

Finally, I will be voting NO on this resolution tonight because for me this is an issue of conscience and a moral decision. Would it be easier for me to just sign on to this brief and remain fairly silent on the issue, leading people to believe I’m 100% with them– yes. Would signing the brief be the politically expedient thing to do– yes. But I believe it is the wrong thing to do for the wrong reasons.

I hope that the information I have provided and clarifying my position has been helpful and I appreciate any feedback from constituents that you feel may be useful.

Peace, JWK

Helping Our City Teenagers

On Thursday, April 26, 2006, I attended a Teen Town Hall Meeting at the Asbury Park Boys and Girls Club. The goal of this meeting was to get teens talking about the issues that impact them as residents of Asbury Park. The discussion covered a wide range of issues - from what teens want to be when they grow up, to their fears about the growing violence in our streets, to their overemphasis on material things.

I came away from the meeting with a number of insights. First, our teens are quite aware of the realities they are facing in our city. Second, our teens need some clear help and guidance from the adults in our community on everything from how to dress, to how to engage in conversation, to taking responsibility for their actions. Third, as a community, we are not investing nearly enough in the lives of our young people. This, for me, is the most critical point.

Let me be clear that when I say “invest” I do not mean money. We have seen through the failures in our City school system, that we cannot just throw money at the problems. All the money in the world cannot replace what these kids need most – our time, tough love and unconditional support.

What can you do to help? VOLUNTEER!!! We currently have a number of programs that can use mentors for our teenagers. Will it take time? Yes. Will it be challenging? Certainly. Will it be worth it? More than you can imagine.

If you are interested in volunteering to be a mentor, email me at jwkeady@cityofasburypark.com and I will connect you with one of the mentoring agencies.

Help Stop Bias and Hate Crimes

On Tuesday, May 2, 2006 I attended a workshop on bias and hate crimes put on by the Q-Spot. The presentation was conducted by Detective Dave D’Amico from the Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office and was attended by Prosecutor Valentin, AP Deputy Chief Kinmon, AP Inspector Van Buren and about forty audience members.

The presentation was extremely informative and I highly recommend that every citizen reach out to the Prosecutor’s office or the Q-Spot and get a copy of “Help to Stop Hate” a powerful primer on bias and hate crimes. Only together can we stop these type of crimes from happening and learning the facts is the first step.

Does Asbury Park Need Rent Control?

Over the past few months, more than one landlord in town has pulled me aside and asked, “I heard you want rent control, is that true?”

My response to this question has been that I do want to consider a rent stabilization or rent control ordinance. Why? It should be no secret to anyone living in Asbury Park over the past five years that housing costs have significantly increased. This has put intense pressure on many families, particularly those families that are living at or near the poverty line (at least 30% of our citizens). My fear is that if redevelopment continues along its current course, we will be flooded with even more land speculators who will buy properties at inflated levels, hoping to flip them at even more inflated levels. The end result of this speculation cycle will be ever-increasing rents and massive gentrification of neighborhoods.

A well-crafted rent stabilization or rent control ordinance would curb this and create a more stable and healthy marketplace. Such an ordinance would show that we want landlords that are in Asbury Park for the long haul. Their profits would be steady and long-term. It would also create a more stable situation for families already living here and would create a greater abundance of affordable rental units for families that want to move to Asbury Park.

As I have researched and discussed this issue, I have heard many arguments against rent stabilization or rent control from landlords with large apartment buildings. None of these arguments have been informed by the facts. I have also heard from the smaller landlords telling me, “Jim, I put my life-savings into the old Victorian house I bought and I’m spending thousands to fix it up. We have a carriage house in the back and we rent out the apartment to help cover costs. If we’re limited in what we can charge, we won’t survive.” You don’t have to worry. Most likely, any ordinance we would consider would not impact you. Why? In most cities, rent stabilization or rent control ordinances only impact buildings with multiple units.

For those of you who feel that “rent control is absolutely wrong for Asbury Park.” Are you sure you know what you are talking about? Are you talking about strong rent control, moderate rent control or restrictive rent control? Do you know the differences between rent control and rent stabilization? Are you basing your arguments on your understanding of rent controls in NYC - controls that were put in place during World War II and are unlike ANY other rent controls in the entire country? Does the rent control you’re thinking about have vacancy decontrols or recontrols? Does the rent control you are thinking about have increases based on the consumer price index, inflation, property upgrades, a combination of these? Do you know which of the landlord’s profit streams – operating profits, tax-write offs or capital gains - rent control impact most?

What I am proposing? First, let’s get the facts on how rent stabilization or rent control would impact our community. To this end, the Asbury Park Affordable Housing Subcommittee has requested that the governing body invite Mr. Connie Pascale (Legal Services of NJ), one of the leading experts in the state on rent stabilization and rent control, to make a presentation to our community at the May 17, 2006 City Council Workshop Session (6pm start time).

Once we have the facts, then we, as a community, can consider what is best. I encourage each of you that are interested in this topic to email me any questions you would like Mr. Pascale to address in his presentation.

My Vision for the "Baronet Block"

There has been significant discussion at recent City Council meetings about preserving the Baronet Theater. I am 100% in support of this effort and want to share my vision for the “Baronet Block.”

I want to preserve the Asbury Lanes, the Fast-Lane and the Baronet Theater and establish this section of Fourth Avenue as an entertainment area. I would also like to amend the Waterfront Redevelopment Plan to allow for a parking deck to be built on the empty lot west of these buildings. On the first story above the aforementioned entertainment venues, I would like to have office space for the community group that will manage the Baronet, as well as affordable artist-loft apartments. This first story will provide two things. First, it will provide some affordable units within the Waterfront Redevelopment Area. Second, it will provide a necessary noise buffer between the entertainment venues and the subsequent stories. The fact that the occupants of these units will deal with noise from the venues is the trade-off for getting something affordable one block from the beach. Above these units I would like to see market-rate condominium units.

In return for Asbury Partner’s potential loss of revenue on the ground floor retail units and the first floor of affordable units and office space, I would like the City to negotiate for increased height on this or another parcel within the Waterfront Redevelopment Area.

To execute this vision, I have reached out to our City Attorney and will reach out to my fellow Councilmembers about proposing a resolution on May 17th that would direct our City staff to begin negotiating these issues with Asbury Partners.

The Westside is on the Move

In the past two weeks, I have attended a number of community meetings on the Westside that were focused on addressing pressing social issues in our city. The majority of these meetings were held in response to the fact that we have had two murders on DeWitt Avenue in the past seven months, both of which happened steps away from one of our community centers. There also have been three other less publicized shootings in the past two weeks - luckily none of these were fatal.

As I participated in these meetings, I was excited by the growing sentiment of residents and community leaders in these neighborhoods that they “have had enough.” They have had enough of the senseless violence, enough of the drug dealing, and enough of the growing gang problem. These feelings were most evident in the community march and rally that took place this past Saturday afternoon.

It was the 14th annual march in memory of Quiana Dees, a 12-year-old girl that was brutally murdered in 1992. Her killer has never been brought to justice. The march has been organized each year by her mother, Penny Dees. This year the march took on added meaning as Ms. Dee’s was joined by relatives and friends of Jerry Jules, Jakeema Kelly, and Saahron Jones – all murdered in our city within the past seven months.

As the march wound its way though the streets of the Westside, I felt a tremendous sense of solidarity among the marchers. I felt a growing spirit that was saying “we are ready to do the difficult work to take back our streets for our children.” As I walked with them, I was immensely proud to be one of their elected officials. The consciousness of the Westside community has been awakened, a floodgate has been opened, and its people are on the move.

As one of the organizers shared with the crowd as we rallied at City Hall following the march, “This is not an event, this is a MOVEMENT.” I wholeheartedly agree and it is a movement that each and every member of our city should support.

Explaining Our New Agreement with Asbury Partners

On April 5, 2006, the Asbury Park City Council passed a resolution to execute a “Dispute Resolution Agreement” with Asbury Partners. This agreement was designed to address the following:

Priority of projects;
Time frames for completion;
Financing commitments;
Consequences for failure to perform.

Since the passing of this resolution, a number of questions have been raised by various members of the public. I will attempt to address some of the most pressing questions here.

Why didn’t the public get to see the agreement prior to the April 5, 2006 City Council meeting?
On Thursday, March 30, 2006, the governing body had an Executive Committee meeting to discuss the conclusion of our negotiations with Asbury Partners on this issue. At the end of this meeting, we agreed that we wanted the final agreement to be available on the City website for the public prior to the April 5, 2006 Council meeting. We agreed that the public deserved to see the agreement prior to the meeting and that this reflected our desire to be responsive and transparent.

On Monday, April 3, 2006, I was made aware that the document had not yet been posted to the City website and that it may not be ready to be posted prior to the meeting. Upon hearing this, I expressed my extreme displeasure with a member of the subcommittee. I explained to this person that I had, in good faith, let members of the public know that the agreement would be available and that I felt this was a very unfortunate development.

While I am comfortable with much of the final content of the agreement, I am very disappointed with what may be perceived by the public as a lack of transparency on the part of the governing body.

I have shared this concern with my fellow council members and with the City Manager and I have agreed to reserve public comment on who was ultimately responsible for this error until after we have had a chance to discuss the details during our April 19, 2006 City Council meeting.

It seems that the timelines and financial commitments in the agreement only cover a limited amount of the work that needs to be done. Why doesn’t the agreement cover ALL the work that needs to be completed?
Let’s use Schedule B that outlines the work to be done on Convention Hall as an example. Here we have clear timelines, outlines of work to be done, and specific amounts for the cost of the work for A-E, which include: Window Replacements, Hazard Repairs, Interior Storefront Replacements, Arcade Entrance Structural Repair, Exterior Storefronts and Entry Doors.

Then we come to Section F titled, “Entire Building Renovation Design.” This section includes a timeline for the following: Schematic Design (January 2007), Design Development (April 2007), Parties to meet to agree on construction timeline (August 2007), Construction Permits Complete (September 2007), and Renovation tasks pursuant to construction timeline to begin (October 2007).

The key item here is “Parties to meet to agree on construction timeline.” This means that by August 2007, we will have a construction timeline, outlines for work to be done, and specific amounts for the cost of the work. It will also mean, pursuant to language in the agreement, that Asbury Partners will have to post financial commitments to complete this work and construction will commence in October 2007.

Why do they only have to post 25% of the project construction costs?
I, too, raised this question with our negotiating team. I was told that: First, 10% is the industry standard, so getting 25% was a good thing. Second, Section 4(b) of the agreement, “Projected Costs,” outlines that Asbury Partners must post performance bonds that cover the costs of the ENTIRE construction contract prior to construction beginning.

Did we negotiate away our ability to name Asbury Partners in default?
No. We still are able to name Asbury Partners in default in the future. We did agree that on the items addressed in Schedules A-E we would not name them in default on any past issues of non-performance.

What if Asbury Partners doesn’t do what they are supposed to do?
Let’s use the 5th Avenue Pavilion as an example. In Schedule A it says that they are supposed to complete construction on emergency repairs by June 2006. Let’s pick one item from the list, “remove paint from brick.” If by the end of June, the paint is not removed from the brick, we will send Asbury Partners a “Letter of Concern.” Once they get this letter, we have 10 business days to resolve the issue with them. If we do not feel the issue is adequately resolved in these 10 days, then we will send them a “Letter of Unresolved Concerns and Request to Arbitrate” and we will enter into binding arbitration to resolve the issue. Once the written demand for arbitration is sent, each party has 45 days to conclude their presentation to the arbitrator. After that, the arbitrator makes a binding decision.

Closing Comments
I hope that the information above addresses the top concerns that citizens have raised with me regarding this agreement. Along with this commentary, I offer the following.

Do I feel that the Waterfront Redevelopment Subcommittee worked extremely hard throughout these negotiations and should be commended for this? Yes.

Do I agree that if Asbury Partners were serious about rehabilitating these properties when they first came to town that this planning work would already have been done? Yes.

Do I agree that the former governing body was short-sighted for not having this kind of accountability in the original agreement? Yes.

Do I feel that our Redevelopment Attorney, Mr. Aaron, should have better advised the former governing body during the negotiations on the original agreement? Yes.

The reality is that these issues are behind us and we now have a clear plan for action and mechanisms for accountability to ensure the work is done. Having this level of accountability with Asbury Partners was one of my top goals when I took office and I am glad that the entire governing body has moved in this direction.

Am I satisfied with this agreement? Yes.

March/April Agenda Update

When I ran for office, I had a very clear platform that included making significant progress in number of areas. These areas include: public safety, recreation, job creation, affordable housing, redevelopment and improving communication between City Hall and the public.

What’s happening in PUBLIC SAFETY?
AP Police Department
As many of you know, we have had another tragic murder in our city this past month with the death of a young man, Jakeema Kelly. The investigation into this murder is ongoing. If you have any information that you feel might be helpful to our Police Department, please contact them at 732.774.1300.

This murder – the second on DeWitt Avenue in the past several months – is a stark reminder that we have a long journey in front of us. The first part of this journey is affirming as a city that this death must not be seen as simply “gang-related violence” or “just another black man killed on the West Side of Asbury Park.” The second part is continuing to marshal all available resources toward improving public safety in our city. I am optimistic that our Police Department is moving in this positive direction. The third part is addressing the root causes of violence on our streets. In an upcoming post to the blog, I will outline how I best feel we can address this issue.

Along with the work of the Police Department, we need citizens to help make our streets safer, especially for our children. To this end, a concrete action that you can take would be volunteering with our Citizens on Patrol (COP) program. If you are interested in receiving more information, please contact our Police Department at 732.774.1300.

AP Fire Department
As I wrote to you in my last communication, our City Fire House was/is not meeting OSHA standards and our firefighters cannot live on the second floor of the building until the structural issues are dealt with. It has been reported to the Mayor and Council that the necessary improvements are continuing to be made. The Council has also established an ad hoc subcommittee to research and report on the best course of action for permanently addressing this issue which will include the building of a new Fire House.

I again thank the city departments for their commitment to providing our citizens with seamless Fire and EMT services.

What’s happening in RECREATION?
Creating a Department of Parks and Recreation
A number of weeks ago, the governing body requested that our City Manager and staff research and report on the best course of action for us to take in creating a Department of Parks and Recreation. On April 11, 2006, I sent a memo to Mr. Reidy asking for an update on this research/report. I am hoping that this work has been completed and that we can begin formal discussions on this matter at our April 19th or May 3rd City Council meeting.

Biddy Basketball League
The Biddy Basketball League organized by our City Recreation Division and the AP Police Athletic League continues to be a success and the race for the championship is heating up. Just before the start of the season, in what now may be seen as a blockbuster move (smile), I was traded by Officer German’s Pistons and joined Assistant City Manager Famularo to coach the Heat. Well, the Heat are now sitting undefeated atop the league and my time spent with the coaches and the players has been wonderful.

On a less competitive note, the most exciting aspect of being part of this program is seeing all of the parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles, brothers, sisters, cousins, etc. pack the gym at the Bradley Elementary School to support the players. As I commented recently in an Asbury Park Press article that was written about the league, “This is what a community is supposed to look like on a Saturday morning.”

If you are interested in helping out with the program, please contact Assistant City Manager, James Famularo at 732.775.2100.

After School Programs
The City Recreation Division continues to conduct its after-school program at the Asbury Park Middle School. For more information, please contact Cheryl Pearsal at 732-502-5747.

Asbury Park Soccer Club – Summer Program
The Asbury Park Soccer Club, which I helped to found three years ago, is now making plans for our annual Summer Soccer Program. Over the past three years, hundreds of kids and adults have taken part in this program and we hope to make this summer even more memorable. If you would like to volunteer as a coach or help manage the program (no soccer experience necessary), please contact me at jwkeady@cityofasburypark.com or 732.502.5196.

What’s happening with the ASBURY WORKS ADVISORY BOARD?
On March 15, 2006, the City Council approved my recommendation to appropriate $280,000 of funding for the Youth Summer Jobs Program from the Community Development and Affordable Housing Fund. The funding was approved with the caveat that it be used as seed money for the next three years, rather than just a one-off funding of the first year. This gives us $93,333 per year for the next three years. To fully fund the program, we will need to raise an additional $187,000 per year.

Thanks to all of the members of the governing body for making this investment in our youth and the future of our city.

To secure the remaining financing, I have made overtures to State Assemblyman Sean Kean, Vic Scudiery, Head of the Monmouth County Democratic Party, as well as three members of our County Board of Freeholders. Along with overtures to the public sector, I will also be reaching out to individuals and businesses in the private sector for funding.

If you would like to be involved in underwriting this program, below is a listing of levels of participation for you to consider.

GOLD LEVEL SPONSORSHIP
Gold Level Sponsors commit to underwriting 10 youths ($2,419 each) for a total of $24,190. In return for your commitment:
Your name will be mentioned in all press materials about the program;
Your name will be featured on our program’s t-shirts;
You will receive an official proclamation from the governing body;
You and five guests will be invited to our end-of-the-program celebration.

SILVER LEVEL SPONSORSHIP
Silver Level Sponsors commit to underwriting 5 youths ($2,419 each) for a total of $12,095. In return for your commitment:
Your name will be mentioned in all press materials about the program;
Your name will be featured on our program’s t-shirts;
You will be invited to our end-of-the-program celebration.

BRONZE LEVEL SPONSORSHIP
Bronze Level Sponsors commit to underwriting 1 youth for a total of $2,419. In return for your commitment:
Your name will be mentioned in all press materials about the program;
You will be invited to our end-of-the-program celebration.

To become a Gold, Silver or Bronze level sponsor, please contact our Asbury Works Director, Tamara Richardson at 732.774.1143.


What’s happening with the AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMITTEE?
STARS Area
At our March 13th and March 27th meetings, the Affordable Housing Committee continued to focus our energy on the STARS Redevelopment Area. We now have significant progress on Areas 1, 2, and 3 of the plan and have met with potential developers for each of these areas.

I am still hopeful that by May, the committee will have recommendations and will be seeking approval from the governing body to move forward on these proposed projects.

Rent Control/Stabilization
As requested by the Affordable Housing Committee, Mr. Connie Pascale from Legal Services of NJ will make a presentation at the April 19, 2006 City Council meeting on the pros and cons of pursuing rent control/stabilization in Asbury Park.

Because Mr. Pascale will make his presentation during the workshop session, questions from the public will not be allowed. If you have any particular questions you would like Mr. Pascale to address in his presentation, please send them to me by Monday, April 17, 2006.

What’s happening with the SPRINGWOOD AVENUE REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE?
The SARAC had a very productive month in March. All subcommittees have been tasked with researching and then reporting their recommendations on items to be included in the plan which will eventually be submitted to the governing body. Subcommittees will report to the full committee on April 20, 2006.

I have been working specifically with the Media and Outreach Subcommittee and the Education and Recreation Subcommittee.

The Media and Outreach Subcommittee had a very successful community forum on March 31, 2006 at the Asbury Village Community Room. The event focused on educating residents about the history of Springwood Avenue. Special thanks to all of the members of the subcommittee for their hard work in making this a successful event.

The Education and Recreation Subcommittee has put together a survey to gather information on all available education and recreation facilities and programming in our city. Once we have this information, we will be equipped to advise the full committee on what types of facilities and programs we may want to establish in the Springwood Avenue corridor as part of our redevelopment plan. I also feel that this information will be very helpful to the Recreation Commission and we will be sure to pass it along to them.

What’s happening with the WATERFRONT REDEVELOPMENT?
Dispute Resolution Agreement
On April 5, 2006, the City Council passed a resolution in favor of the “Dispute Resolution Agreement” with Asbury Partners. This agreement was/is meant to address the following issues:

Priority of projects;
Time frames for completion;
Financing commitments;
Consequences for failure to perform.

Given the importance of the agreement, I have posted a separate blog entry addressing specific concerns that citizens have raised with me.

What’s happening to improve the SHARING OF INFORMATION FROM CITY HALL?
www.keadyreport.blogspot.com
If you are reading this, you are now on my new blog. Please send me any constructive feedback on how I can make this blog an even better resource for you. Also, please email two friends and encourage them to visit the blog.

www.cityofasburypark.com
There continues to be an increased amount of public documents available via our city website. Please be sure that you visit it regularly.

Constituent Meetings
On March 3, 2006, I had the pleasure of meeting some of my younger constituents at the Bradley Elementary School. As part of the Read Across America initiative, I visited a number of classes and read one of my all-time favorites, Green Eggs and Ham, by Dr. Seuss. Both the children and the faculty were wonderful hosts and very gracious listeners.

On March 13, 2006, I met with Robert Taylor from the Boys and Girls Club to continue our discussions on how the Club and the City can better cooperate to provide a full slate of educational and recreational opportunities for our citizens.

On March 22, 2006, I attended the business meeting of the Neighborhood Preservation Project. It was a very well-run and well-attended meeting. This is one initiative that I hope we can expand to other neighborhoods throughout the city. During the meeting, members discussed topics including public safety issues, involving children with the NPP, a planned community rally and a community float for the 4th of July parade. I was given some time to field questions from committee members and I encouraged each of them to continue to come to City Council meetings so that they can be informed on pressing issues. I offer special thanks to Ms. Hazel Samuels for her work with this initiative.

On March 27, 2006, I visited the Westside Community Center to discuss the murder of Jakeema Kelly with Mrs. Susan Maynard and several community members. Mrs. Maynard shared as much information as she had at that moment and we agreed to continue communicating to develop concrete plans of action to address the violence in that area.

Coming to Your Neighborhood
If you would like me to visit your neighborhood or meet with your organization or group, please contact me at jwkeady@cityofasburypark.com or 732.502.5196.


How can I GET INVOLVED?
Please attend City Council meetings on the first and third Wednesdays of the month. The Workshop Session begins at 6pm and the Regular Public Meeting begins at 7pm. It is important that we have as many informed citizens as possible and your participation in these meetings is invaluable.

If you are interested in helping with any of the initiatives listed above, please email me at jwkeady@cityofasburypark.com or call me at 732.502.5196 and I will be sure to help get you involved in a meaningful way.

If there is an issue you would like me to address publicly, please email your question to me and I will do my best to include it on The Keady Report blog.

To help me keep citizens informed, please send an email to at least one other person from Asbury Park and ask them to join my constituent email list by contacting me at jwkeady@cityofasburypark.com or by visiting www.keadyreport.blogspot.com. If you know someone that does not use email, please print this out and give it to them. Then, ask them to mail me their contact information at Councilman Keady ~ 1 Municipal Plaza ~ Asbury Park, NJ 97712 and I will be sure to keep in touch with them.

I look forward to hearing from you. Remember, together, we can and will make Asbury Park great again!

Peace, JWK